🔗 Share this article

Transpired he was able to withstand a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial European final against one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, undermining the team's most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight defender in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a coach who often railed his squad for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this whole painful saga seems to paint the director in a whole new light. It may have been easy, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among football's true generals: a strategic mind that the club's competitors will now be rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Regarding Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director , after being involved in the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade him to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these entreaties faced pushback. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered by a man with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, with no penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as him – function on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Power Behind the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the commands of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace data science and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style to football “will be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

A Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to go into a club and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many companies have such individuals established? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to invest the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the tactics by the directors and appoint a coach who will adapt their methods to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not responsible for the product, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents neoliberalism in action: the rise of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose choices are always untouchable, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then fire them for playing excessively that system. Hire the process guy and later discard him for requiring too long. And above all show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.